Pages

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Who(m) Should I Vote For?

I’ve been thinking about the various blog posts a few weeks back after the rather low turn out for the primary election, as well as trying to figure out where I am coming from as far as local politics and the upcoming elections.

Local elections seem always to have a relatively lower turn out. I think voters think that generally local politics don’t impact their lives as much. I also think that things are pretty good here overall, because of or in spite of local politics I don't know, and that is a voting disincentive.

I think that there also may be a sense, here and elsewhere, that the real players in local politics are not even the elected officials. Here in Guilford County it seems that the two most powerful people are employees – Terry Grier and Mitch Johnson. And of course there are the moneyed people putting together the deals in the back rooms as with everywhere else. Our mayor isn’t even a real mayor; he’s more of a figurehead. Maybe Billy would shake things up a little, even as a figurehead. At least he’d always have the “Billy Pulpit!”

For myself, there has been a sense of growing cynicism over the years. I have found our local governments to be rather childish generally, and dominated by special interests, including developers on the one hand and the Skip Alston crowd on the other. I have a friend who refers to the council members as real estate whores. You might find that sort of thing said in the prophetic books of the Bible – maybe there is something to it.

It seems we’re paralyzed by the politics of race and the politics of development.

I wish real estate folks and developers should recuse themselves from many of our important votes.

But look at the present slate, it is filled with developers and real estate people. Are these the only folks with enough time and money to serve on our councils, or do they have secret back room meetings where they choose who will run to represent their collective interests each election cycle?

All that being said, I think the city and county have done well regarding downtown and regarding recent corporate decisions, especially out at the airport with Honda and now Skybus. I wonder if those things would have happened without the infrastructure created by the Fed Ex project.

There are two or three issues that dominate my concerns looking ahead at the new election.

First, I want to see real transparency in local government. I am tired of the childish hide and seek games. If the city council had released information in a timely manner we may have come closer to resolving the whole Wray affair; or we would have already long concluded that we couldn’t resolve it. I think all of the incumbents should be kicked out.

Second, I want to see our county develop in a planned and orderly and environmentally friendly manner. Who amongst all of our developer politicians is going to allow that? I’ve seen some good signs from Joe Wilson, but otherwise I think sprawl and all the problems that go with it will continue until we have folks looking after the interest of the whole and not the interest of the most recent development project.

Third, I want to see our gang problem addressed. Public safety and security is the primary purpose of government, and we are dropping the ball. Unfortunately I don’t really trust the city to properly allocate money given for police to help with gangs, and anti gang units are known for corruption. It’s a nasty business.

Fourth, I want to see us address the problem of both the chronically and acutely homeless. They can’t panhandle, and now they can’t loiter. I mean, what are they supposed to do, walk in circles all day? Seems we need 2 or 3 more shelters with options for longer stays, group homes, easier access to subsidized medical care, including mental health care, employment assistance, and the option of being committed somewhere if their human life is at stake.

Fifth, I think way too much money is going into brick and mortar for schools, and way too little money for teachers. There is not a brand spanking new building in the world that can compete with well paid highly qualified teachers in terms of educational quality. Less money for superintendents of various kinds, less money for buildings, and more money for teachers. We need to incentivize our best college students into teaching.

Sixth, I would like to see the city "just say no" to annexation against the will of the annexed. I know the state allows for this, but it strikes me as so fundamentally undemocratic that I think we should decline the privilege.

Seventh, I personally would like to see more school choice, especially vouchers for those in the least well performing schools, and if not vouchers more magnet and charter schools.

Eighth, though as a white person I doubt I will ever adequately appreciate the damage done to communities, families, and individuals over time by slavery, Jim Crow laws, and general racism, I would like to see us looking to the future together and not the past. I’m tired of the race card being always held in the hand, ready to pull out. I think it results in dumb decisions being made out of fear.

Ninth, is the Heart of the Triad really ever going to be something? I am not sure that Triad regionalism is the right way to go. I think a Metro Guilford approach is smarter, taking advantage of the real population and transportation patterns that we have already.

Tenth and finally, and this is like, duh, of course I would go for this, but I’d like to see a tree ordinance. Developer scare tactics about how this will suddenly make housing unaffordable are just that – scare tactics. There is a significant economic, aesthetic, environmental, and quality of life downside to the loss of our tree canopy. I think I heard Joe Wilson address this too. What, a real estate person with a heart for trees? Ah, life can be good.

Well, maybe you can remind me of the ten things I haven’t thought about. I always leave out something in any top ten, as when I left David Gilmour off my list of top ten favorite guitar players. What an idiot!

Please also tell me who you think I should vote for, given 1 through 10 above.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

For myself, there has been a sense of growing cynicism over the years. I have found our local governments to be rather childish generally, and dominated by special interests, including developers on the one hand and the Skip Alston crowd on the other. I have a friend who refers to the council members as real estate whores. You might find that sort of thing said in the prophetic books of the Bible – maybe there is something to it.

I'd love to be able to vote in the Greensboro election, for the afore mentioned reasons, but though I live in Guilford Co. I reside in North High Point and have to deal with a city council here that thinks the Furniture market is alive and well. Of course the awning made all the difference!

Anonymous said...

Joel ,I think you should vote for Joe Wilson,He addresses the issues and has suggested some solutions. You know where he stands and he won't back down without a darn good reason. He will also be a force for change.Ed Cone said he is a tree hugger.Read his blog ,I like him for the job.

Billy Jones said...

At the risk of sounding like talking points.
1. There is no need for back room closed door meetings. Even personel matters can be handled pubicly if done with respect.

2. I support Joe Wilson's ideas for controlling growth.

3. I think you already know where I stand on the gang issue but I'll remind your readers that I am the only candidate for mayor who lives agross the street from a street gang.

4. I think a farm would be a great start towards solving local homeless issues for those willing to live there. It could be a place that would feed, house and rehabilitate homeless persons until they get back on their feet. A community of their own to take pride in. I don't support forcing the homeless into farms or work camps but for those willing to become a part of it I think it would become their best option.

5.What can I say except to agree. You're 100% correct.

6. I am against all forced annexation and any voluntary annexation unless we already have available 100% of the city services.

7. I hope it's okay for a candidate to say I don't have an answer. At least, not yet.

8. I agree. Race is the tool politricksters use to keep us divided. For example: You brought up Skip and Billy and the nonsence they are famous for. Have you ever sat in on a County Commissioners meeting and watch them when the cameras are turned-off? The two of them are buds, they even play golf together. Billy's district is white, Skip's district is black and both plan to keep it that way. Our City leaders, while slightly more sofisticated, are hardly any different.

9. The Heart Of The Triad is a scheme to put millions of dollars into the pockets of Robbie Perkins and others behind the scenes at the expence of the taxpayers-- nothing more. Did you also know that Perkins is advocation the sale of Haganstone Park? His premise is that Plesant Garden should buy the park but Plesant Garden doesn't have the funding so who does that leave as a buyer for the park? I don't know but I promise you Robbie will get a piece of the action.

Joe Wilson agrees with you on trees. So do I. As for who you should vote for, here's my choices: http://www.musecrafters.com/bloggingpoet/2746/Billy%26%23039%3Bs+Picks+For+Greensboro+City+Council.html

I hope that helps.